So Aristotle this week was interesting. Rhetoric
certainly prompts interesting discussions in our group. This week, for instance, Aristotle talked
about the best arguments to make for killing innocent children.
This gave us pause.
I’ve already mentioned that in Rhetoric
Aristotle seems almost amoral at times, but this was rather over the
top. What possible argument could anyone
make for killing innocent children?
To be fair, when we read the argument, it did have a certain
plausibility to it. (Now, don’t everyone
write angry comments. Anyway, plausible
as it may have been, it didn’t convince me, though I can’t speak for everyone
in the group.) What Aristotle did was
quote Homer, the Iliad, a line that says something like: If you
vanquish your enemies, can you let their children live, knowing that they may
grow up to seek revenge on you?
Interesting point. If
you defeat the Nazis, I wondered aloud, would you want to kill their
children? But my answer to that was
no. Someone in the group said, You’re
such a liberal. Maybe. I remember The Boys from Brazil (warning: spoiler alert), in which it turns
out that a bunch of Hitler’s children are on the loose. One radical group wants to kill them, but
Laurence Olivier says, They’re only children.
And I shouldn’t leave you with the impression that Aristotle
is in favour of killing innocent children.
He’s only saying that if you want an argument in favour of doing that,
here it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment