So I went to see Captain Phillips last night, with Tom
Hanks, whom I quite like, and the movie’s quite good, and all that, maybe not
his best, like, say, Beethoven’s 8th. What I was most enjoying about it was the
strange bond that seemed to develop between his character and the character of
the pirate captain/kidnapper.
“Irish,” the pirate called him, and they were clearly at
odds, but sort of in the way that lead characters are at odds at the beginning
of some buddy movie (the by-the-book cop and the rebel, that sort of thing),
and by the end they’re close. East is
East, and West is West, but they do meet …
Or like in Catch Me If You Can, where the Hanks character in
effect bonds with Leonardo di Caprio, even though one is the cop and one is the
criminal.
But okay in this case it’s a nefarious pirate; you shouldn’t
sympathize with him, I suppose, and if I did, then I suppose that’s the
Stockholm Syndrome at work. Or maybe the
film set things up that way, only at the end to … [Spoiler Alert] pull the plug
on the poor pirate. They should have
just sailed their separate ways, tipping their caps, but no …
Maybe I’m just too suggestible or susceptible. I always take the side of whoever’s story I’m
reading. I remember reading The Johnny
Unitas Story as a kid and wanting Baltimore to
win that game, though when I put the book down I thought, I don’t cheer for Baltimore.
It’s possible, of course, for an author to write from a
certain character’s point of view and make you distrust or even dislike that
character. It even became popular in
critical circles a few decades back to see this everywhere. The Unreliable Narrator was all the rage, and
there are certainly examples: the Duke in My Last Duchess and so forth. But really I think it’s a bit rare. If you’re with a character, then you’re with
a character. It’s hard to be against the
one you’re with: maybe that is the
Stockholm Syndrome in a nutshell. In
confined space with your captor, even if he is your captor, well, you’re close
to him, you identify with him, you become his Patty Hearst.
So I liked the pirate leader in Captain Phillips and was sad
to see what happened to him and his buddies, even though of course piracy is
wrong, blah blah blah. The movie itself
seemed to me to go downhill at the end when deprived of the interesting
Hanks-Pirate Chief chemistry.
Just before the end there’s an interesting bonding scene
when, in explaining why he can’t just let Hanks go or take the small amount
being offered, the Pirate Chief (his name is Muse) says, “I’ve got
bosses.” To which Hanks replies, “We’ve
all got bosses.” “In America it’s
different,” says Muse.
It’s touching, but then it is snatched away. Is there something especially touching about
connecting with an enemy? Maybe that’s
the appeal of the whole John Le Carre Tinker, Tailor series.
In any case it all seems to connect to the notion that if
you can’t be with the one you love, you’ll love the one you’re with. Even if it’s your enemy.
No comments:
Post a Comment